{"id":416,"date":"2023-02-10T10:00:52","date_gmt":"2023-02-10T10:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/?p=416"},"modified":"2023-02-10T10:00:53","modified_gmt":"2023-02-10T10:00:53","slug":"structure-health-assessment-and-audit-of-a-fire-damage-structure-using-non-destructive-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/?p=416","title":{"rendered":"Structure Health Assessment and Audit of a Fire Damage Structure Using Non Destructive Testing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"596\" height=\"351\" src=\"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Untitled.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-418\" srcset=\"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Untitled.jpg 596w, https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Untitled-300x177.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 596px) 100vw, 596px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Institutional Building<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>S.NO<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>TEST NAME<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>REFERENCE OF TEST<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>PURPOSE OF TEST ,TEST RESULT &amp; COMMENT<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>REFERENCE<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>1<\/td><td>Rebound Hammer Test<\/td><td>IS 13311 (Part-2)-1992, ASTM C 805-02, BS 6089:1981 and BS 1881: Part 202, BSEN:13791<\/td><td>To determining the estimated\u00a0 compressive strength and uniformity of concrete<br><br>Around 36 test conducted on RCC slab and beams and compressive strength of concrete tested range from M16-M30 Grade of concrete<br><br>Which is more than M20 as per the latest codal provision of\u00a0 IS 456:2000<\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>2<\/td><td>Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity<\/td><td>IS 13311 (Part-1)-1992,\u00a0 ASTM: C597-83,\u00a0 BS 6089: 1981 and BS 1881: Part 203 and BSEN:13791<\/td><td>To determine the quality of concrete, soundness and density of concrete.<br><br>Around 36 test conducted on RCC slab and column and its quality is found to be Doubtful-Good Concrete.<br><br>Which clearly indicates that there is presence of minor voids\/minor cracks inside the concrete which is not exposed on the surface till now<\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>3<\/td><td>Half Cell Potential Test<\/td><td>ASTM C876-1980 ,ASTM C876 [6]-1991<\/td><td>To determine the percentage of risk of corrosion in reinforcement<br><br>Around 5 test have been performed on RCC beam and slab. It is\u00a0 found out that chances of corrosion is 0%-3% in reinforcement bars<br><br>As per testing its, clear that the existing reinforcement in members are rusted about 10% of existing diameter of steel\u00a0<\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4<\/td><td>Carbonation\u00a0 Test<\/td><td>BS EN: 14630<\/td><td>If depth of carbonation is greater than cover, then incubation period is over; degradation rate will be accelerated.<br><br>4 Samples are extracted and its average carbonation depth is found to be less than effective cover.<br><br>It is in the permissible limits as per Indian Codal provision<\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>5<\/td><td>pH Value Test<\/td><td>BS EN 14630<\/td><td>Around 5 test conducted on RCC slab ,beam and column and its quality is found to be alkaline\u00a0 value<\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>6<\/td><td>Cover Depth Measurement<\/td><td>\u00a0IS:456:2000<\/td><td>To see the adequacy of concrete cover to Rebars and creation of Contour Mapping of cover depth in RCC Structure.<br><br>6 Test were performed on RCC slab, &amp; column&amp; Sufficient Cover is found to be there to all structural members.<br><br>It is sufficient as per the Indian Codal \u00a0provision IS 456:2000<\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>7<\/td><td>Core Cutting<\/td><td>IS:456:2000<br>\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0IS 516:1959<br>\u00a0\u00a0 IS 1199-1959: \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Part 4<br>BS 1881: Part 4: 1970<br>ASTM C: 42 \u2013 77<br>BS EN 13791:2007<\/td><td>Around 4 test conducted on RCC slab ,beam and column and its quality is found to be M21 value.<br><br><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Recommendations :<\/strong>&#8211;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1. Central slab area as highlighted need to be dismantle and recast. The new steel will be same as per previous design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. Periphery\/Low effected slab need to be treated with patch repair as per Repair A and low vicious injection grouting at spacing of 300mm c\/c both ways using 12mm NRV nozzles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3. All the effected beams need to be jacketed by means of RCC jacketing as attached in the report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>4. Some columns need to be treated with patch repair and injection grouting just 1000mm from top area only.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S.NO TEST NAME REFERENCE OF TEST PURPOSE OF TEST ,TEST RESULT &amp; COMMENT REFERENCE 1 Rebound Hammer Test IS 13311 (Part-2)-1992, ASTM C 805-02, BS 6089:1981 and BS 1881: Part 202, BSEN:13791 To determining the estimated\u00a0 compressive strength and uniformity of concrete Around 36 test conducted on RCC slab and beams and compressive strength of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=416"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":419,"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions\/419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/structureauditagency.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}